Цинк vs Higher Absorption Magnesium Glycinate 350mg
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Цинк
Higher Absorption Magnesium Glycinate 350mg
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Цинк and Higher Absorption Magnesium Glycinate 350mg side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Цинк is the clear winner. With 182 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Цинк contains significantly more sugar (8.5g) compared to the milder Higher Absorption Magnesium Glycinate 350mg (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Higher Absorption Magnesium Glycinate 350mg is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Цинк or Higher Absorption Magnesium Glycinate 350mg?
It depends on your goals. Цинк has 68 calories, while Higher Absorption Magnesium Glycinate 350mg has 250 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Цинк vegan?
No, Цинк is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Цинк and Higher Absorption Magnesium Glycinate 350mg?
There is a difference of 182 calories per 100g between the two products.
