1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk vs Sweet Fish
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk
Sweet Fish
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing 1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, 1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk is the clear winner. With 197 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. 1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk contains significantly more sugar (9.17g) compared to the milder Sweet Fish (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Fish is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? 1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Fish in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: 1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk or Sweet Fish?
It depends on your goals. 1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk has 62.5 calories, while Sweet Fish has 260 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is 1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk vegan?
No, 1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between 1% Low-fat Chocolate Milk and Sweet Fish?
There is a difference of 197 calories per 100g between the two products.
