Head-to-Head Analysis

365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal vs Ridge Cut Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of 365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal

365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Ridge Cut Potato Chips

Ridge Cut Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
377 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
1.6g
Sugars
0g
0.8g
Fat
25g
11.5g
Protein
10.7g
0g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal and Ridge Cut Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, 365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal is the clear winner. With 123 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. 365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal contains significantly more sugar (1.64g) compared to the milder Ridge Cut Potato Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ridge Cut Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal or Ridge Cut Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. 365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal has 377 calories, while Ridge Cut Potato Chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal vegan?

No, 365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 365 everyday value, whole grain wheat squares cereal and Ridge Cut Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 123 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.