Head-to-Head Analysis

4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt vs ALL NATURAL TURKEY SAUSAGE

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of 4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt

4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ALL NATURAL TURKEY SAUSAGE

ALL NATURAL TURKEY SAUSAGE

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
571.4 kcal
Energy
160.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
42.9g
Fat
8g
50g
Protein
17.9g
2.5g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing 4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt and ALL NATURAL TURKEY SAUSAGE side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 411 more calories per 100g than ALL NATURAL TURKEY SAUSAGE. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? 4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt offers a protein boost with 50g per 100g, outperforming ALL NATURAL TURKEY SAUSAGE in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: 4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt or ALL NATURAL TURKEY SAUSAGE?

It depends on your goals. 4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt has 571.42857142857 calories, while ALL NATURAL TURKEY SAUSAGE has 160.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is 4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt vegan?

No, 4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between 4505 Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds Classic Chili & Salt and ALL NATURAL TURKEY SAUSAGE?

There is a difference of 411 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.