88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate vs Original Ruffles
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate
Original Ruffles
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing 88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate and Original Ruffles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 72 more calories per 100g than Original Ruffles. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. 88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (10.7g) compared to the milder Original Ruffles (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Ruffles is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? 88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Original Ruffles in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: 88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate or Original Ruffles?
It depends on your goals. 88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate has 643 calories, while Original Ruffles has 571 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is 88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate vegan?
No, 88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between 88% Cocoa Extreme Dark Chocolate and Original Ruffles?
There is a difference of 72 calories per 100g between the two products.
