Head-to-Head Analysis

Albacore white tuna in water pouch vs Pink Salmon Wild

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Albacore white tuna in water pouch

Albacore white tuna in water pouch

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pink Salmon Wild

Pink Salmon Wild

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
224 kcal
Energy
105.9 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
3.5g
Fat
2.4g
48.2g
Protein
21.2g
1.7g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Albacore white tuna in water pouch and Pink Salmon Wild side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Albacore white tuna in water pouch is the more energy-dense option here, packing 118 more calories per 100g than Pink Salmon Wild. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Albacore white tuna in water pouch offers a protein boost with 48.2g per 100g, outperforming Pink Salmon Wild in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Albacore white tuna in water pouch or Pink Salmon Wild?

It depends on your goals. Albacore white tuna in water pouch has 224 calories, while Pink Salmon Wild has 105.8824 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Albacore white tuna in water pouch vegan?

No, Albacore white tuna in water pouch is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Albacore white tuna in water pouch and Pink Salmon Wild?

There is a difference of 118 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.