Head-to-Head Analysis

ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE vs Tic Tac Orange

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE

ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tic Tac Orange

Tic Tac Orange

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
46.1 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
1.5g
Sugars
0g
1.5g
Fat
0g
6.2g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE and Tic Tac Orange side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE is the more energy-dense option here, packing 46 more calories per 100g than Tic Tac Orange. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE contains significantly more sugar (1.54g) compared to the milder Tic Tac Orange (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tic Tac Orange is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE offers a protein boost with 6.15g per 100g, outperforming Tic Tac Orange in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE or Tic Tac Orange?

It depends on your goals. ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE has 46.1 calories, while Tic Tac Orange has 0.001 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE vegan?

No, ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ALMOND milk NON-DAIRY PROTEIN SHAKE COFFEE and Tic Tac Orange?

There is a difference of 46 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.