Head-to-Head Analysis

ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor vs Alphameta

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor

ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Alphameta

Alphameta

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
392 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
6.6g
6.7g
Fat
3.9g
0g
Protein
8.1g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor and Alphameta side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor is the clear winner. With 192 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Alphameta (6.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Alphameta is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor or Alphameta?

It depends on your goals. ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor has 200 calories, while Alphameta has 392 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor vegan?

No, ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ALMONDMILK & OATMILK CREAMER Caramel Macchiato Inspired Flavor and Alphameta?

There is a difference of 192 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.