Head-to-Head Analysis

Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark vs Rold Gold Thins Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark

Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Rold Gold Thins Original

Rold Gold Thins Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
618 kcal
Energy
393 kcal
23.5g
Sugars
3.6g
47.1g
Fat
3.6g
11.8g
Protein
7.1g
0.6g
Salt
4.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark and Rold Gold Thins Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark is the more energy-dense option here, packing 225 more calories per 100g than Rold Gold Thins Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark contains significantly more sugar (23.5g) compared to the milder Rold Gold Thins Original (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Rold Gold Thins Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark offers a protein boost with 11.8g per 100g, outperforming Rold Gold Thins Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark or Rold Gold Thins Original?

It depends on your goals. Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark has 618 calories, while Rold Gold Thins Original has 393 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark vegan?

No, Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Almonds & Sea Salt 72% Cocoa-dark and Rold Gold Thins Original?

There is a difference of 225 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.