Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend vs Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend

Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches

Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
41.7 kcal
Energy
28.2 kcal
10.8g
Sugars
6.2g
0g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend and Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend is the more energy-dense option here, packing 14 more calories per 100g than Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend contains significantly more sugar (10.8g) compared to the milder Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches (6.21g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend or Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches?

It depends on your goals. Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend has 41.7 calories, while Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches has 28.2 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend vegan?

No, Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple Flavored Juice Cocktail Blend and Pacific Cooler Flavored Juice Pouches?

There is a difference of 14 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.