Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple maple breakfast sausage vs Barbecue kettle potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple maple breakfast sausage

Apple maple breakfast sausage

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Barbecue kettle potato chips

Barbecue kettle potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
183 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
10g
Sugars
7.1g
7.5g
Fat
32.1g
15g
Protein
7.1g
1.4g
Salt
1.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple maple breakfast sausage and Barbecue kettle potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Apple maple breakfast sausage is the clear winner. With 353 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple maple breakfast sausage contains significantly more sugar (10g) compared to the milder Barbecue kettle potato chips (7.1428571428571g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Barbecue kettle potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apple maple breakfast sausage offers a protein boost with 15g per 100g, outperforming Barbecue kettle potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple maple breakfast sausage or Barbecue kettle potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Apple maple breakfast sausage has 183 calories, while Barbecue kettle potato chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple maple breakfast sausage vegan?

No, Apple maple breakfast sausage is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple maple breakfast sausage and Barbecue kettle potato chips?

There is a difference of 353 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.