Head-to-Head Analysis

Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken vs ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken

Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS

ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
160 kcal
Energy
17 kcal
10.9g
Sugars
0g
9g
Fat
0g
5.8g
Protein
0g
1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken and ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken is the more energy-dense option here, packing 143 more calories per 100g than ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken contains significantly more sugar (10.9g) compared to the milder ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken offers a protein boost with 5.77g per 100g, outperforming ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken or ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS?

It depends on your goals. Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken has 160 calories, while ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS has 17 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken vegan?

No, Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apple & Walnut Salad with Chicken and ROASTED RED BELL PEPPERS?

There is a difference of 143 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.