Head-to-Head Analysis

Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak vs Chicken breast tenders

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak

Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken breast tenders

Chicken breast tenders

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
175 kcal
Energy
208 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
6.1g
Fat
12.5g
28.1g
Protein
12.5g
3.3g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak and Chicken breast tenders side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak is the clear winner. With 33 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak contains significantly more sugar (1.75g) compared to the milder Chicken breast tenders (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken breast tenders is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak offers a protein boost with 28.1g per 100g, outperforming Chicken breast tenders in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak or Chicken breast tenders?

It depends on your goals. Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak has 175 calories, while Chicken breast tenders has 208 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak vegan?

No, Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Applewood Smoked Uncured Ham Steak and Chicken breast tenders?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.