Head-to-Head Analysis

Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers vs Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers

Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry

Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
407 kcal
26.7g
Sugars
22.2g
6.7g
Fat
18.5g
13.3g
Protein
3.7g
1.8g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers and Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers is the clear winner. With 7 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers contains significantly more sugar (26.67g) compared to the milder Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry (22.2g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers offers a protein boost with 13.33g per 100g, outperforming Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers or Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry?

It depends on your goals. Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers has 400 calories, while Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry has 407 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers vegan?

No, Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Apricot, Fig And Lemon Crackers and Mott's Soft Baked Bars Berry?

There is a difference of 7 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.