Head-to-Head Analysis

Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana vs Perfectly Ripe Avocado

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana

Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Perfectly Ripe Avocado

Perfectly Ripe Avocado

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
211 kcal
Energy
159 kcal
3.5g
Sugars
0g
6.1g
Fat
15.9g
28.1g
Protein
1.8g
2.5g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana and Perfectly Ripe Avocado side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana is the more energy-dense option here, packing 52 more calories per 100g than Perfectly Ripe Avocado. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana contains significantly more sugar (3.51g) compared to the milder Perfectly Ripe Avocado (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Perfectly Ripe Avocado is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana offers a protein boost with 28.1g per 100g, outperforming Perfectly Ripe Avocado in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana or Perfectly Ripe Avocado?

It depends on your goals. Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana has 211 calories, while Perfectly Ripe Avocado has 159 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana vegan?

No, Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Artisan Vegan Salami Sweet Toscana and Perfectly Ripe Avocado?

There is a difference of 52 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.