Head-to-Head Analysis

Artisans Hawaiian Bund vs Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Artisans Hawaiian Bund

Artisans Hawaiian Bund

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice

Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
284 kcal
Energy
66.7 kcal
7.5g
Sugars
0g
3.7g
Fat
6.7g
9g
Protein
0g
1.1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Artisans Hawaiian Bund and Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Artisans Hawaiian Bund is the more energy-dense option here, packing 217 more calories per 100g than Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Artisans Hawaiian Bund contains significantly more sugar (7.46g) compared to the milder Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Artisans Hawaiian Bund offers a protein boost with 8.96g per 100g, outperforming Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Artisans Hawaiian Bund or Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice?

It depends on your goals. Artisans Hawaiian Bund has 284 calories, while Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice has 66.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Artisans Hawaiian Bund vegan?

No, Artisans Hawaiian Bund is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Artisans Hawaiian Bund and Coffee mate Zero Sugar Pumpkin Spice?

There is a difference of 217 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.