Head-to-Head Analysis

Baby Clams vs Solod white albacore tune

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Baby Clams

Baby Clams

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Solod white albacore tune

Solod white albacore tune

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
58.8 kcal
Energy
97.3 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
0g
0.6g
Fat
0.9g
10.6g
Protein
23g
0.7g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Baby Clams and Solod white albacore tune side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Baby Clams is the clear winner. With 38 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Baby Clams contains significantly more sugar (1.18g) compared to the milder Solod white albacore tune (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Solod white albacore tune is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Baby Clams or Solod white albacore tune?

It depends on your goals. Baby Clams has 58.8 calories, while Solod white albacore tune has 97.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Baby Clams vegan?

No, Baby Clams is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Baby Clams and Solod white albacore tune?

There is a difference of 38 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.