Head-to-Head Analysis

Back Bacon Rasher vs Traditional Rotisserie Chicken

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Back  Bacon Rasher

Back Bacon Rasher

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Traditional Rotisserie Chicken

Traditional Rotisserie Chicken

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
303 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
0.5g
Sugars
0g
22.7g
Fat
9.5g
24.3g
Protein
25g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Back Bacon Rasher and Traditional Rotisserie Chicken side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Back Bacon Rasher is the more energy-dense option here, packing 303 more calories per 100g than Traditional Rotisserie Chicken. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Back Bacon Rasher or Traditional Rotisserie Chicken?

It depends on your goals. Back Bacon Rasher has 303 calories, while Traditional Rotisserie Chicken has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Back Bacon Rasher vegan?

No, Back Bacon Rasher is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Back Bacon Rasher and Traditional Rotisserie Chicken?

There is a difference of 303 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.