Baum Roll vs Original Savory Thin Crackers
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Baum Roll
Original Savory Thin Crackers
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Baum Roll and Original Savory Thin Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Baum Roll is the more energy-dense option here, packing 82 more calories per 100g than Original Savory Thin Crackers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Baum Roll contains significantly more sugar (53.1g) compared to the milder Original Savory Thin Crackers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Original Savory Thin Crackers is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Baum Roll or Original Savory Thin Crackers?
It depends on your goals. Baum Roll has 515 calories, while Original Savory Thin Crackers has 433 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Baum Roll vegan?
No, Baum Roll is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Baum Roll and Original Savory Thin Crackers?
There is a difference of 82 calories per 100g between the two products.
