Beef bologna vs Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Beef bologna
Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Beef bologna and Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Beef bologna is the more energy-dense option here, packing 237 more calories per 100g than Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Beef bologna contains significantly more sugar (3.125g) compared to the milder Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham (1.79g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Beef bologna or Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham?
It depends on your goals. Beef bologna has 343.75 calories, while Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham has 107 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Beef bologna vegan?
No, Beef bologna is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Beef bologna and Ultra Thin Sliced Black Forest Ham?
There is a difference of 237 calories per 100g between the two products.
