Head-to-Head Analysis

Beef Franks vs Sugar free fruitwood smoked uncured bacon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Beef Franks

Beef Franks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sugar free fruitwood smoked uncured bacon

Sugar free fruitwood smoked uncured bacon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
150 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
13.3g
Fat
13.3g
6.2g
Protein
20g
2.4g
Salt
2.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Beef Franks and Sugar free fruitwood smoked uncured bacon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Beef Franks is the clear winner. With 50 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Beef Franks contains significantly more sugar (1.77g) compared to the milder Sugar free fruitwood smoked uncured bacon (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sugar free fruitwood smoked uncured bacon is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Beef Franks or Sugar free fruitwood smoked uncured bacon?

It depends on your goals. Beef Franks has 150 calories, while Sugar free fruitwood smoked uncured bacon has 200 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Beef Franks vegan?

No, Beef Franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Beef Franks and Sugar free fruitwood smoked uncured bacon?

There is a difference of 50 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.