Head-to-Head Analysis

Bing vs Jack links beef tender strips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Bing

Bing

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Jack links beef tender strips

Jack links beef tender strips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
11.8 kcal
Energy
357.1 kcal
2.7g
Sugars
7.1g
0g
Fat
21.4g
0g
Protein
39.3g
0g
Salt
4.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Bing and Jack links beef tender strips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Bing is the clear winner. With 345 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Bing takes the lead with only 2.65g of sugar per 100g, whereas Jack links beef tender strips contains 7.1428571428571g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Bing or Jack links beef tender strips?

Bing appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Bing vegan?

No, Bing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Bing and Jack links beef tender strips?

There is a difference of 345 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.