Head-to-Head Analysis

BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED vs Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED

BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink

Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
84.6 kcal
Energy
31.7 kcal
0.8g
Sugars
7.2g
0g
Fat
0g
5.4g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED and Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED is the more energy-dense option here, packing 53 more calories per 100g than Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED takes the lead with only 0.769g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink contains 7.19g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED offers a protein boost with 5.38g per 100g, outperforming Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED or Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink?

It depends on your goals. BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED has 84.6 calories, while Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink has 31.7 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED vegan?

No, BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between BLACK BEANS NO SALT ADDED and Organic Yerba Mate Blackberry Energy Drink?

There is a difference of 53 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.