Head-to-Head Analysis

Black forest unclear ham vs Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Black forest unclear ham

Black forest unclear ham

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless

Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
162 kcal
Energy
125 kcal
2.3g
Sugars
0g
4.7g
Fat
4g
27.9g
Protein
19.6g
2.7g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Black forest unclear ham and Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Black forest unclear ham is the more energy-dense option here, packing 37 more calories per 100g than Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Black forest unclear ham contains significantly more sugar (2.33g) compared to the milder Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Black forest unclear ham offers a protein boost with 27.9g per 100g, outperforming Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Black forest unclear ham or Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless?

It depends on your goals. Black forest unclear ham has 162 calories, while Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless has 125 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Black forest unclear ham vegan?

No, Black forest unclear ham is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Black forest unclear ham and Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless?

There is a difference of 37 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.