Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar vs Lesser Evil Watermelon Hibisucus
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar
Lesser Evil Watermelon Hibisucus
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar and Lesser Evil Watermelon Hibisucus side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 51 more calories per 100g than Lesser Evil Watermelon Hibisucus. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar contains significantly more sugar (52g) compared to the milder Lesser Evil Watermelon Hibisucus (10.7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lesser Evil Watermelon Hibisucus is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar or Lesser Evil Watermelon Hibisucus?
It depends on your goals. Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar has 480 calories, while Lesser Evil Watermelon Hibisucus has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar vegan?
No, Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Blue Razz Sour Filled Milk Chocolate Bar and Lesser Evil Watermelon Hibisucus?
There is a difference of 51 calories per 100g between the two products.
