Blueberries vs Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Blueberries
Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Blueberries and Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Blueberries is the clear winner. With 289 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Blueberries contains significantly more sugar (8.57g) compared to the milder Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta (3.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Blueberries or Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta?
It depends on your goals. Blueberries has 50 calories, while Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta has 339 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Blueberries vegan?
No, Blueberries is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Blueberries and Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta?
There is a difference of 289 calories per 100g between the two products.
