Head-to-Head Analysis

Blueberry Cobbler vs Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Blueberry Cobbler

Blueberry Cobbler

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee

Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
366 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
12.7g
Sugars
0g
8.5g
Fat
0g
28.2g
Protein
0g
0.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Blueberry Cobbler and Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Blueberry Cobbler is the more energy-dense option here, packing 366 more calories per 100g than Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Blueberry Cobbler contains significantly more sugar (12.7g) compared to the milder Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Blueberry Cobbler offers a protein boost with 28.2g per 100g, outperforming Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Blueberry Cobbler or Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee?

It depends on your goals. Blueberry Cobbler has 366 calories, while Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Blueberry Cobbler vegan?

No, Blueberry Cobbler is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Blueberry Cobbler and Pacific Horizon Medium Roast Ground Coffee?

There is a difference of 366 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.