Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins vs Franks
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins
Franks
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins and Franks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins is the clear winner. With 227 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Franks contains 2.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins offers a protein boost with 20.5g per 100g, outperforming Franks in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins or Franks?
Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins vegan?
No, Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Boneless skinless chicken tenderloins and Franks?
There is a difference of 227 calories per 100g between the two products.
