Head-to-Head Analysis

Brads raw chips sweet potato organic vs Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Brads raw chips sweet potato organic

Brads raw chips sweet potato organic

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo

Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
321.4 kcal
Energy
517 kcal
10.7g
Sugars
41.4g
10.7g
Fat
24.1g
7.1g
Protein
3.5g
0.9g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Brads raw chips sweet potato organic and Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Brads raw chips sweet potato organic is the clear winner. With 196 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Brads raw chips sweet potato organic takes the lead with only 10.714285714286g of sugar per 100g, whereas Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo contains 41.38g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Brads raw chips sweet potato organic offers a protein boost with 7.1428571428571g per 100g, outperforming Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Brads raw chips sweet potato organic or Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo?

Brads raw chips sweet potato organic appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Brads raw chips sweet potato organic vegan?

No, Brads raw chips sweet potato organic is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Brads raw chips sweet potato organic and Nabisco Double Stuf Cookies Golden Oreo?

There is a difference of 196 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.