Head-to-Head Analysis

Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa vs Rice crispy treats

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa

Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Rice crispy treats

Rice crispy treats

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
480 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
16g
Sugars
39.3g
26.7g
Fat
14.3g
13.3g
Protein
3.6g
0.3g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa and Rice crispy treats side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa is the more energy-dense option here, packing 51 more calories per 100g than Rice crispy treats. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa takes the lead with only 16g of sugar per 100g, whereas Rice crispy treats contains 39.2857g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa offers a protein boost with 13.3g per 100g, outperforming Rice crispy treats in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa or Rice crispy treats?

It depends on your goals. Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa has 480 calories, while Rice crispy treats has 428.5714 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa vegan?

No, Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Breakfast sandwich biscuits hazelnut - cocoa and Rice crispy treats?

There is a difference of 51 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.