Head-to-Head Analysis

Breakfast Wrap vs Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Breakfast Wrap

Breakfast Wrap

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts

Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
189 kcal
Energy
54 kcal
4.4g
Sugars
2.3g
6.9g
Fat
0g
9.4g
Protein
0.8g
1.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Breakfast Wrap and Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Breakfast Wrap is the more energy-dense option here, packing 135 more calories per 100g than Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Breakfast Wrap contains significantly more sugar (4.4g) compared to the milder Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts (2.31g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Breakfast Wrap offers a protein boost with 9.43g per 100g, outperforming Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Breakfast Wrap or Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts?

It depends on your goals. Breakfast Wrap has 189 calories, while Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts has 54 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Breakfast Wrap vegan?

No, Breakfast Wrap is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Breakfast Wrap and Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts?

There is a difference of 135 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.