Head-to-Head Analysis

Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast vs APPLES + BLUEBERRIES MINI FRUIT BAR

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast

Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast

Not Vegan
VS
Package of APPLES + BLUEBERRIES MINI FRUIT BAR

APPLES + BLUEBERRIES MINI FRUIT BAR

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
157 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
0.7g
Sugars
45g
7.9g
Fat
0g
18.6g
Protein
5g
0.8g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast and APPLES + BLUEBERRIES MINI FRUIT BAR side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast is the clear winner. With 143 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast takes the lead with only 0.714g of sugar per 100g, whereas APPLES + BLUEBERRIES MINI FRUIT BAR contains 45g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast offers a protein boost with 18.6g per 100g, outperforming APPLES + BLUEBERRIES MINI FRUIT BAR in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast or APPLES + BLUEBERRIES MINI FRUIT BAR?

Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast vegan?

No, Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Broccoli & cheese stuffed chicken breast and APPLES + BLUEBERRIES MINI FRUIT BAR?

There is a difference of 143 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.