Head-to-Head Analysis

Butterscotch Baking Chips vs Omega -3 trail mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Butterscotch Baking Chips

Butterscotch Baking Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Omega -3 trail mix

Omega -3 trail mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
533 kcal
Energy
558 kcal
66.7g
Sugars
20.9g
23.3g
Fat
44.2g
0g
Protein
16.3g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Butterscotch Baking Chips and Omega -3 trail mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Butterscotch Baking Chips is the clear winner. With 25 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Butterscotch Baking Chips contains significantly more sugar (66.7g) compared to the milder Omega -3 trail mix (20.9g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Omega -3 trail mix is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Butterscotch Baking Chips or Omega -3 trail mix?

It depends on your goals. Butterscotch Baking Chips has 533 calories, while Omega -3 trail mix has 558 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Butterscotch Baking Chips vegan?

No, Butterscotch Baking Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Butterscotch Baking Chips and Omega -3 trail mix?

There is a difference of 25 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.