Head-to-Head Analysis

Cabot vintage white vs Gluten Free Fire Roasted Vegetable Baked Crackers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Cabot vintage white

Cabot vintage white

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Gluten Free Fire Roasted Vegetable Baked Crackers

Gluten Free Fire Roasted Vegetable Baked Crackers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
392.9 kcal
Energy
433.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
6.7g
32.1g
Fat
13.3g
25g
Protein
6.7g
1.8g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cabot vintage white and Gluten Free Fire Roasted Vegetable Baked Crackers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Cabot vintage white is the clear winner. With 40 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Cabot vintage white takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Gluten Free Fire Roasted Vegetable Baked Crackers contains 6.6666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Cabot vintage white offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Gluten Free Fire Roasted Vegetable Baked Crackers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cabot vintage white or Gluten Free Fire Roasted Vegetable Baked Crackers?

Cabot vintage white appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Cabot vintage white vegan?

No, Cabot vintage white is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cabot vintage white and Gluten Free Fire Roasted Vegetable Baked Crackers?

There is a difference of 40 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.