Head-to-Head Analysis

California Pistachios vs Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of California Pistachios

California Pistachios

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free

Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
567 kcal
Energy
372.9 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
23.7g
46.7g
Fat
2.5g
20g
Protein
8.5g
0.5g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing California Pistachios and Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

California Pistachios is the more energy-dense option here, packing 194 more calories per 100g than Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, California Pistachios takes the lead with only 6.67g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free contains 23.728813559322g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? California Pistachios offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: California Pistachios or Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free?

It depends on your goals. California Pistachios has 567 calories, while Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free has 372.8813559322 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is California Pistachios vegan?

No, California Pistachios is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between California Pistachios and Organic Maple Buckwheat Flakes Gluten Free?

There is a difference of 194 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.