Head-to-Head Analysis

California White Basmati Gourmet Rice vs Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of California White Basmati Gourmet Rice

California White Basmati Gourmet Rice

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend

Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
355.6 kcal
Energy
127 kcal
0g
Sugars
6g
1.1g
Fat
7.3g
6.7g
Protein
6.7g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing California White Basmati Gourmet Rice and Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

California White Basmati Gourmet Rice is the more energy-dense option here, packing 229 more calories per 100g than Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, California White Basmati Gourmet Rice takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend contains 6g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: California White Basmati Gourmet Rice or Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend?

It depends on your goals. California White Basmati Gourmet Rice has 355.555555555556 calories, while Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend has 127 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is California White Basmati Gourmet Rice vegan?

No, California White Basmati Gourmet Rice is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between California White Basmati Gourmet Rice and Vanilla & Cinnamon plant-based coconut blend?

There is a difference of 229 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.