Head-to-Head Analysis

Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix vs Colombian Instant coffee

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix

Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Colombian Instant coffee

Colombian Instant coffee

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
1 kcal
68.6g
Sugars
0.3g
8.6g
Fat
0g
8.6g
Protein
0.1g
1.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix and Colombian Instant coffee side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix is the more energy-dense option here, packing 399 more calories per 100g than Colombian Instant coffee. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix contains significantly more sugar (68.57g) compared to the milder Colombian Instant coffee (0.3g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Colombian Instant coffee is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix offers a protein boost with 8.57g per 100g, outperforming Colombian Instant coffee in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix or Colombian Instant coffee?

It depends on your goals. Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix has 400 calories, while Colombian Instant coffee has 1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix vegan?

No, Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Caramel & Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix and Colombian Instant coffee?

There is a difference of 399 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.