Head-to-Head Analysis

Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps vs Premium California Pistachios Roasted & Salted With Sea Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps

Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Premium California Pistachios Roasted & Salted With Sea Salt

Premium California Pistachios Roasted & Salted With Sea Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
155 kcal
Energy
607.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
7.1g
8.5g
Fat
50g
11.3g
Protein
21.4g
0g
Salt
1.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps and Premium California Pistachios Roasted & Salted With Sea Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps is the clear winner. With 452 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Premium California Pistachios Roasted & Salted With Sea Salt contains 7.1428571428571g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps or Premium California Pistachios Roasted & Salted With Sea Salt?

Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps vegan?

No, Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Carb Balance Whole Wheat Tortilla Wraps and Premium California Pistachios Roasted & Salted With Sea Salt?

There is a difference of 452 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.