Head-to-Head Analysis

Catfish Fillets vs Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Catfish Fillets

Catfish Fillets

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water

Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
98.2 kcal
Energy
115 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
3.6g
Fat
0.9g
17g
Protein
26.5g
0.1g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Catfish Fillets and Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Catfish Fillets is the clear winner. With 17 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Catfish Fillets or Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water?

It depends on your goals. Catfish Fillets has 98.2 calories, while Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water has 115 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Catfish Fillets vegan?

No, Catfish Fillets is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Catfish Fillets and Starkist selects solid white albacore tuna in water?

There is a difference of 17 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.