Head-to-Head Analysis

Caviar vs Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Caviar

Caviar

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored

Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
267 kcal
Energy
333.3 kcal
0g
Sugars
60g
16.7g
Fat
1.7g
26.7g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Caviar and Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Caviar is the clear winner. With 66 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Caviar takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored contains 60g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Caviar offers a protein boost with 26.7g per 100g, outperforming Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Caviar or Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored?

Caviar appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Caviar vegan?

No, Caviar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Caviar and Soft Eating Licorice Mango Flavored?

There is a difference of 66 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.