Head-to-Head Analysis

Cesar dressing vs Evaporated Milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Cesar dressing

Cesar dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Evaporated Milk

Evaporated Milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1230 kcal
Energy
422 kcal
11.1g
Sugars
33.3g
122g
Fat
22.2g
11.1g
Protein
22.2g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cesar dressing and Evaporated Milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cesar dressing is the more energy-dense option here, packing 808 more calories per 100g than Evaporated Milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Cesar dressing takes the lead with only 11.1g of sugar per 100g, whereas Evaporated Milk contains 33.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cesar dressing or Evaporated Milk?

It depends on your goals. Cesar dressing has 1230 calories, while Evaporated Milk has 422 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cesar dressing vegan?

No, Cesar dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cesar dressing and Evaporated Milk?

There is a difference of 808 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.