Head-to-Head Analysis

Charcuterie duet vs 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Charcuterie duet

Charcuterie duet

Not Vegan
VS
Package of 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips

0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
210 kcal
Energy
533 kcal
1g
Sugars
13.3g
18g
Fat
46.7g
13g
Protein
6.7g
2.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Charcuterie duet and 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Charcuterie duet is the clear winner. With 323 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Charcuterie duet takes the lead with only 1g of sugar per 100g, whereas 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips contains 13.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Charcuterie duet offers a protein boost with 13g per 100g, outperforming 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Charcuterie duet or 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips?

Charcuterie duet appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Charcuterie duet vegan?

No, Charcuterie duet is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Charcuterie duet and 0207 Sante 72% Cacao Dark Chocolate Made With Coconut Sugar Baking Chips?

There is a difference of 323 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.