Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken vs Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chicken

Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree

Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107 kcal
Energy
64 kcal
0g
Sugars
7.2g
2.7g
Fat
0g
21.4g
Protein
1.6g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken and Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken is the more energy-dense option here, packing 43 more calories per 100g than Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Chicken takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree contains 7.2g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken or Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree?

It depends on your goals. Chicken has 107 calories, while Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree has 64 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken vegan?

No, Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken and Organic Peter Rabbit Pear, Carrot & Beet Fruit & Vegetable Puree?

There is a difference of 43 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.