Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Hot Links vs Whole Baby Clams

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken Hot Links

Chicken Hot Links

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Whole Baby Clams

Whole Baby Clams

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
205 kcal
Energy
175 kcal
2.4g
Sugars
0g
12.1g
Fat
3.3g
21.7g
Protein
29.7g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Hot Links and Whole Baby Clams side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken Hot Links is the more energy-dense option here, packing 30 more calories per 100g than Whole Baby Clams. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken Hot Links contains significantly more sugar (2.42g) compared to the milder Whole Baby Clams (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Whole Baby Clams is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Hot Links or Whole Baby Clams?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Hot Links has 205 calories, while Whole Baby Clams has 175 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Hot Links vegan?

No, Chicken Hot Links is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Hot Links and Whole Baby Clams?

There is a difference of 30 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.