Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Quesadilla vs Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken Quesadilla

Chicken Quesadilla

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons

Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
46000 kcal
Energy
450 kcal
200g
Sugars
45g
3100g
Fat
22.5g
1900g
Protein
2.5g
295g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Quesadilla and Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken Quesadilla is the more energy-dense option here, packing 45550 more calories per 100g than Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken Quesadilla contains significantly more sugar (200g) compared to the milder Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons (45g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken Quesadilla offers a protein boost with 1900g per 100g, outperforming Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Quesadilla or Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Quesadilla has 46000 calories, while Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons has 450 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Quesadilla vegan?

No, Chicken Quesadilla is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Quesadilla and Sondey Dark Chocolate Coconut Macaroons?

There is a difference of 45550 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.