Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Ramen vs Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken Ramen

Chicken Ramen

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
413 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
1.6g
Sugars
0g
19g
Fat
30g
7.9g
Protein
0g
5g
Salt
6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Ramen and Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken Ramen is the more energy-dense option here, packing 113 more calories per 100g than Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken Ramen contains significantly more sugar (1.59g) compared to the milder Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken Ramen offers a protein boost with 7.94g per 100g, outperforming Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Ramen or Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Ramen has 413 calories, while Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Ramen vegan?

No, Chicken Ramen is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Ramen and Pitted California Style Ripe Olives, Medium?

There is a difference of 113 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.