Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito vs Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito

Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps

Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
242 kcal
Energy
150 kcal
1.3g
Sugars
0g
11.5g
Fat
5g
11g
Protein
12.5g
0.9g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito and Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito is the more energy-dense option here, packing 92 more calories per 100g than Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito contains significantly more sugar (1.32g) compared to the milder Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito or Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito has 242 calories, while Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps has 150 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito vegan?

No, Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Sausage Breakfast Burrito and Tumaro's, Whole Wheat Low-In-Carb Warps?

There is a difference of 92 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.