Head-to-Head Analysis

chicken thighs vs Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of chicken thighs

chicken thighs

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts

Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
135 kcal
Energy
54 kcal
7.3g
Sugars
2.3g
3.7g
Fat
0g
17.7g
Protein
0.8g
1.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing chicken thighs and Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

chicken thighs is the more energy-dense option here, packing 81 more calories per 100g than Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. chicken thighs contains significantly more sugar (7.29g) compared to the milder Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts (2.31g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? chicken thighs offers a protein boost with 17.7g per 100g, outperforming Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: chicken thighs or Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts?

It depends on your goals. chicken thighs has 135 calories, while Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts has 54 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is chicken thighs vegan?

No, chicken thighs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between chicken thighs and Native Forest, Organic Sliced Water Chestnuts?

There is a difference of 81 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.