Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless vs Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless

Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
125 kcal
Energy
181.8 kcal
0g
Sugars
6.1g
4g
Fat
12.1g
19.6g
Protein
15.2g
0.2g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless and Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless is the clear winner. With 57 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties contains 6.06060606060606g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless offers a protein boost with 19.6g per 100g, outperforming Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless or Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties?

Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless vegan?

No, Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Thighs, boneless, skinless and Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties?

There is a difference of 57 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.