Head-to-Head Analysis

Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt vs Dried Wild Blueberries

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt

Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dried Wild Blueberries

Dried Wild Blueberries

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464.3 kcal
Energy
375 kcal
0g
Sugars
82.5g
21.4g
Fat
0g
10.7g
Protein
0g
2.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt and Dried Wild Blueberries side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt is the more energy-dense option here, packing 89 more calories per 100g than Dried Wild Blueberries. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dried Wild Blueberries contains 82.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt offers a protein boost with 10.714285714286g per 100g, outperforming Dried Wild Blueberries in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt or Dried Wild Blueberries?

It depends on your goals. Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt has 464.28571428571 calories, while Dried Wild Blueberries has 375 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt vegan?

No, Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chickpea Chips With Pink Himalayan Salt and Dried Wild Blueberries?

There is a difference of 89 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.